Bearing Failure Evidence Worksheet and Field Guide
Build one traceable investigation record from operating context and repeatable measurements through competing hypotheses, corrective action and post-repair verification.
Beginner → Intermediate → Advanced workflow
- Beginner—define the event: assign a non-confidential investigation ID, identify the asset and bearing position, and record the operating state when the symptom occurred.
- Intermediate—capture comparable evidence: record each measurement point, direction, method, instrument, units, timestamp and relevant load so another competent person can repeat it.
- Advanced—test and verify: document competing hypotheses, supporting and contradicting evidence, the controlled corrective action, commissioning checks and the post-repair trend.
Prerequisite: review the Bearing Failure Diagnosis Guide and the approved site/OEM method. The worksheet organizes evidence; it does not decide whether the equipment is safe to operate or inspect.
Use one row per investigation event
Keep each event and bearing position separate. If readings are repeated under a materially different load, speed, date or measurement setup, preserve the earlier evidence and create a linked record in the site's controlled system. Do not overwrite an abnormal baseline after repair.
Use roles instead of unnecessary personal information. Before sharing a working copy, remove confidential asset identifiers, photographs, work-order details and commercial information.
Field groups and intended use
Identity and operating context
- Investigation_ID / Asset_ID / Bearing_Position: stable references that connect the symptom, removed part, work order and retest without exposing restricted information.
- Bearing_Designation / Arrangement: record approved information or safely visible markings; do not remove guards or disturb equipment merely to fill a field.
- Speed_RPM / Load_or_Process_State / Operating_Hours: establish whether later readings are genuinely comparable.
- Recent_Work_or_Change: include relevant lubrication, alignment, installation, process or control changes without assuming causation.
Measurement repeatability
- Measurement_Point / Direction: identify the approved axial or radial position and sensor orientation.
- Instrument_or_Method / Instrument_ID / Units: state how the value was obtained and retain settings or raw data where the monitoring program requires them.
- Overall_Vibration / High_Frequency_or_Envelope_Observation: separate measured values from interpretation. A single reading does not prove a bearing failure mode.
- Surface_Temperature / Acoustic_Observation: record the repeatable location, operating stage and method; trend context matters more than an isolated value.
Lubrication, inspection and removed-part evidence
- Lubricant_Identity / Method / Last_Lubrication_Date: compare the record with approved lubricant and relubrication requirements.
- Lubricant_Condition / Contamination_or_Leakage_Observation: describe visible evidence and sampling context without declaring a source prematurely.
- Seal_Condition / Alignment_or_Fit_Evidence: record observations or approved measurements, including uncertainty.
- Removed_Part_Evidence_Reference: link controlled photographs, orientation marks, sample or handover records without embedding confidential content in the public template.
Hypotheses, action and verification
- Competing_Hypotheses: list credible alternatives such as lubrication, contamination, misalignment, incorrect fit, overload, installation damage or electrical erosion.
- Supporting_Evidence / Contradicting_Evidence: state what moves each hypothesis up or down; absence of evidence should not be presented as confirmation.
- Cause_Status: use a controlled status such as suspected, supported, confirmed by approved analysis or inconclusive.
- Corrective_Action / Commissioning_Checks: connect the supported cause to authorized work and safe return-to-service checks.
- Post_Repair_Baseline / Trend_Result: verify the original symptom under representative duty and record whether further monitoring or investigation remains open.
Record quality check
- Confirm the bearing position, measurement point, direction, units and operating state.
- Preserve original readings and removed-part evidence before cleaning, repair or replacement.
- Distinguish observed facts, measured values, interpretation and confirmed findings.
- Record contradictory or non-representative evidence and plan a controlled retest.
- Verify corrective work with comparable measurements, not startup noise alone.
Safety, privacy and engineering limitations
This worksheet is an educational record structure, not an approved inspection procedure, vibration-analysis report, work order, engineering acceptance certificate or authorization to operate, touch or dismantle equipment. It intentionally provides no universal vibration, temperature, clearance, lubrication or shutdown limits.